Back to Intelligence

DARK PROJECT Ransomware Gang: 3 New Victims Posted — Energy, Transportation & Automotive Targeting Analysis With Detection Rules

SA
Security Arsenal Team
August 6, 2026
12 min read

Classification: TLP:AMBER | Report Date: 2026-08-07 | Source: ransomware.live monitoring of DARK PROJECT .onion leak site, CISA KEV


Executive Summary

Dark web monitoring of the DARK PROJECT ransomware operation's leak site confirms three new victim postings on 2026-08-04, spanning two countries and three sectors: Reid Electric Service, Inc (Energy & Utilities, US), TSC Logistics (Transportation, PH), and Long-Lewis Automotive Group (US). The simultaneous single-day posting of three victims indicates either a coordinated detonation wave or a batch-disclosure extortion tactic designed to maximize pressure. Enterprise defenders in energy, logistics, and automotive retail — particularly mid-market organizations with Check Point, Cisco, or ConnectWise perimeter infrastructure — should treat this as an active campaign and validate the detection content in this briefing.


1. Threat Actor Profile — DARK PROJECT

AttributeAssessment
ModelRansomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) with affiliate-driven intrusions; leak site operated centrally by core group
AliasesDARK PROJECT (primary branding); no confirmed rebrand lineage at time of writing
Extortion ModelDouble extortion — data exfiltration precedes encryption; non-payers published to .onion leak site
Typical Ransom DemandMid-five to low-six figures USD, scaled to victim revenue; mid-market focus keeps demands below enterprise-max headlines to improve payment probability
Initial Access VectorsEdge/VPN appliance exploitation, exposed RDP, phishing with malicious attachments, and abuse of remote access tooling (e.g., ConnectWise ScreenConnect)
Dwell TimeEstimated 5–14 days from initial access to detonation based on observed campaign tempo
Victim ProfileMid-market organizations ($10M–$250M revenue) in sectors with high operational-continuity pressure

Analyst Note: DARK PROJECT's victim selection — a regional electrical contractor, a Philippine logistics firm, and a US automotive dealership group — is consistent with opportunistic affiliate-driven targeting of organizations with weak perimeter hygiene rather than strategic sector campaigns. All three victims likely share a common denominator: an unpatched edge device or exposed remote access service.


2. Current Campaign Analysis

Victim Breakdown (2026-08-04 Posting Wave)

VictimSectorCountryEst. Profile
Reid Electric Service, IncEnergy & UtilitiesUSRegional electrical contractor; critical infrastructure adjacency makes this a high-pressure extortion target
TSC LogisticsTransportationPHLogistics/freight operator; strong leverage via supply-chain disruption threat
Long-Lewis Automotive GroupAutomotiveUSMulti-location dealership group; DMS systems hold PII and financing data — prime exfil target

Sector Targeting Assessment

  • Energy & Utilities: Contractor-level targeting rather than direct OT/utility operators. This is a deliberate play — service firms hold network diagrams, credentials, and access pathways into larger utility environments, creating secondary victimization risk for any utility that contracts with compromised firms.
  • Transportation & Logistics: Disruption-sensitive sector where downtime costs escalate hourly; historically high payment propensity.
  • Automotive Retail: Dealership groups aggregate customer PII, credit applications, and financing data — ideal for double extortion leverage.

Geographic Concentration

United States (2/3 victims) and Philippines (1/3). The US concentration aligns with standard ransomware economics (higher payment capacity). The Philippine victim suggests affiliate expansion into Southeast Asia, where detection and response maturity is often lower.

Posting Frequency & Escalation

Three victims published in a single day is a batch disclosure pattern. Two interpretations: (1) affiliates executed parallel intrusions with coordinated extortion timing, or (2) the group is clearing a backlog to create pressure optics. Either way, defenders should assume additional victims are in the extortion pipeline and not yet public.

CVE Correlation — Probable Initial Access Vectors

The following CISA KEV entries are confirmed ransomware-associated and map directly to DARK PROJECT's known access methodology:

CVEProductAccess Vector Relevance
CVE-2026-50751Check Point Security Gateway (IKEv1 improper authentication)Primary suspect — perimeter VPN gateway compromise; added to KEV 2026-06-08, squarely within this campaign's dwell-time window
CVE-2026-20131Cisco Secure FMC / SCC Firewall Management (deserialization)Firewall management plane takeover enabling policy manipulation and lateral access
CVE-2024-1708ConnectWise ScreenConnect (path traversal → RCE)MSP/RMM channel compromise — highly relevant for mid-market victims managed by IT providers
CVE-2023-21529Microsoft Exchange (deserialization, authenticated RCE)Post-foothold internal pivot and persistence
CVE-2026-48027Nx Console (embedded malicious code)Supply-chain/developer-workstation vector

Priority action: Any organization running Check Point gateways with IKEv1 enabled must verify patch status against CVE-2026-50751 immediately. The KEV addition date (2026-06-08) versus this posting wave (2026-08-04) fits a textbook exploitation timeline.


3. Detection Engineering

Sigma Rules

YAML
---
title: DARK PROJECT - Check Point VPN Anomalous Authentication Followed by Internal Connection
id: a7f3c1d2-8e4b-4a1f-9c2d-darkproject01
status: experimental
description: Detects successful VPN authentication from unusual source geography followed by internal RDP/SMB connection attempts within a short window, consistent with DARK PROJECT edge-device initial access (CVE-2026-50751 pattern)
author: Security Arsenal Threat Intelligence
date: 2026/08/07
references:
    - https://securityarsenal.com/darkside
    - https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog
logsource:
    category: authentication
    product: checkpoint
    service: vpn
detection:
    selection:
        action: 'accept'
        protocol: 'IKEv1'
    filter_known_good:
        src_ip|cidr:
            - '10.0.0.0/8'
            - '172.16.0.0/12'
            - '192.168.0.0/16'
    condition: selection and not filter_known_good
fields:
    - src_ip
    - user
    - auth_method
timeframe: 30m
falsepositives:
    - Legitimate remote workforce from new locations
level: high
tags:
    - attack.initial_access
    - attack.t1190
    - attack.t1133
---
title: DARK PROJECT - Pre-Encryption Staging via PsExec, WMI, and Mass File Renaming
id: b8e4d2f3-9a5c-4b2e-8d3f-darkproject02
status: experimental
description: Detects PsExec/WMI remote execution combined with vssadmin shadow copy deletion or mass file extension changes — hallmark DARK PROJECT pre-detonation behavior
author: Security Arsenal Threat Intelligence
date: 2026/08/07
logsource:
    category: process_creation
    product: windows
detection:
    selection_lateral:
        Image|endswith:
            - '\psexec.exe'
            - '\psexesvc.exe'
            - '\wmic.exe'
    selection_shadow:
        Image|endswith:
            - '\vssadmin.exe'
            - '\wmic.exe'
            - '\bcdedit.exe'
        CommandLine|contains:
            - 'delete shadows'
            - 'shadowcopy delete'
            - 'recoveryenabled no'
    selection_rclone:
        Image|endswith:
            - '\rclone.exe'
            - '\megacmd.exe'
            - '\filezilla.exe'
    condition: 1 of selection_*
timeframe: 15m
falsepositives:
    - Legitimate administrative tooling (allowlist by service account and source host)
level: critical
tags:
    - attack.lateral_movement
    - attack.t1021.002
    - attack.t1047
    - attack.impact
    - attack.t1490
    - attack.exfiltration
---
title: DARK PROJECT - ScreenConnect or Suspicious RMM Execution Outside Approved Path
id: c9f5e3a4-0b6d-4c3f-7e4a-darkproject03
status: experimental
description: Detects execution of remote access tooling (ScreenConnect, AnyDesk, TeamViewer) from non-standard paths — consistent with DARK PROJECT persistence via abused RMM software (CVE-2024-1708 exploitation follow-on)
author: Security Arsenal Threat Intelligence
date: 2026/08/07
logsource:
    category: process_creation
    product: windows
detection:
    selection:
        Image|endswith:
            - '\screenconnect.clientservice.exe'
            - '\anydesk.exe'
            - '\teamviewer.exe'
            - '\screenconnect.windowsclient.exe'
    filter_approved:
        Image|startswith:
            - 'C:\Program Files\ScreenConnect'
            - 'C:\Program Files\ConnectWise'
            - 'C:\Program Files (x86)\ScreenConnect'
    condition: selection and not filter_approved
falsepositives:
    - Portable RMM deployments by helpdesk (validate and allowlist)
level: high
tags:
    - attack.persistence
    - attack.command_and_control
    - attack.t1219

Microsoft Sentinel KQL — Pre-Ransomware Staging & Lateral Movement Hunt

KQL — Microsoft Sentinel / Defender
// DARK PROJECT Hunt: Pre-detonation staging indicators
// Looks for shadow copy deletion, mass file renames, RMM tool anomalies, and
// unusual outbound transfer volume within a 7-day window
let lookback = 7d;
let RenamedExt = dynamic([".darkproject", ".locked", ".encrypted", ".crypt"]);
let ShadowDeletion =
    DeviceProcessEvents
    | where Timestamp > ago(lookback)
    | where ProcessCommandLine has_any ("delete shadows", "shadowcopy delete", "recoveryenabled no", "wbadmin delete catalog")
    | project ShadowTime=Timestamp, DeviceName, AccountName, ProcessCommandLine, InitiatingProcessFileName;
let MassRename =
    DeviceFileEvents
    | where Timestamp > ago(lookback)
    | where ActionType == "FileRenamed"
    | extend NewExt = tolower(extract(@"\.([^.]+)$", 1, FileName))
    | where NewExt in~ (RenamedExt) or FileName matches regex @"\.[a-z0-9]{6,10}$"
    | summarize RenameCount = count(), FirstSeen = min(Timestamp) by DeviceName, FolderPath, InitiatingProcessFileName
    | where RenameCount > 50;
let SuspiciousRMM =
    DeviceProcessEvents
    | where Timestamp > ago(lookback)
    | where FileName has_any ("screenconnect", "anydesk", "teamviewer", "rclone", "megacmd")
    | where not(FolderPath has_any ("C:\\Program Files\\ScreenConnect", "C:\\Program Files\\ConnectWise"))
    | project RMMTime=Timestamp, DeviceName, FileName, FolderPath, AccountName;
let HighEgress =
    DeviceNetworkEvents
    | where Timestamp > ago(lookback)
    | where RemoteIPType == "Public"
    | summarize TotalBytesOut = sum(BytesSent), DistinctDests = dcount(RemoteIP) by DeviceName, InitiatingProcessFileName
    | where TotalBytesOut > 500000000 and InitiatingProcessFileName has_any ("rclone", "7z", "winrar", "powershell");
ShadowDeletion
| join kind=leftouter MassRename on DeviceName
| join kind=leftouter SuspiciousRMM on DeviceName
| join kind=leftouter HighEgress on DeviceName
| project DeviceName, AccountName, ShadowTime, ProcessCommandLine, RenameCount, FolderPath, RMMTime, FileName, TotalBytesOut, DistinctDests
| order by ShadowTime desc

PowerShell — Rapid Triage: Scheduled Tasks, Shadow Copies, and Exposed RDP

PowerShell
# DARK PROJECT Rapid Triage Script - run on suspected hosts or via PS remoting at scale
# Checks: recent scheduled tasks, volume shadow copy integrity, RDP exposure, suspicious RMM services
$lookback = (Get-Date).AddDays(-7)
$report = @()

Write-Host "[1] Scheduled tasks created/modified in last 7 days..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
$tasks = Get-ScheduledTask | Where-Object { $_.Date -gt $lookback } | Select-Object TaskName, TaskPath, Date, @{N='Action';E={$_.Actions.Execute}}
$report += $tasks | ForEach-Object { "[TASK] $($_.TaskName) | $($_.TaskPath) | $($_.Date) | $($_.Action)" }

Write-Host "[2] Volume Shadow Copy status..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
$shadows = Get-CimInstance Win32_ShadowCopy -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue
if (-not $shadows) { $report += "[ALERT] NO volume shadow copies present - possible pre-ransomware deletion (T1490)" }
else { $shadows | ForEach-Object { $report += "[VSS] $($_.DeviceObject) created $($_.InstallDate)" } }

Write-Host "[3] RDP exposure check..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
$rdpEnabled = (Get-ItemProperty 'HKLM:\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Terminal Server').fDenyTSConnections -eq 0
$nla = (Get-ItemProperty 'HKLM:\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Terminal Server\WinStations\RDP-Tcp' -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue).UserAuthentication
$report += "[RDP] Enabled=$rdpEnabled | NLA=$nla (NLA must be 1)"
if ($rdpEnabled -and $nla -ne 1) { $report += "[ALERT] RDP exposed without NLA - brute force risk" }

Write-Host "[4] Suspicious RMM services..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
$suspicious = Get-CimInstance Win32_Service | Where-Object { $_.Name -match 'screenconnect|anydesk|teamviewer|mesh|rustdesk' -and $_.PathName -notmatch 'Program Files' }
if ($suspicious) { $suspicious | ForEach-Object { $report += "[ALERT] RMM service outside approved path: $($_.Name) -> $($_.PathName)" } }
else { $report += "[RMM] No unauthorized RMM services detected" }

Write-Host "[5] Recent failed logon bursts (RDP/VPN brute force indicator)..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
$fails = Get-WinEvent -FilterHashtable @{LogName='Security'; Id=4625; StartTime=$lookback} -MaxEvents 2000 -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue | Group-Object {$_.Properties[19].Value} | Where-Object { $_.Count -gt 50 }
if ($fails) { $fails | ForEach-Object { $report += "[ALERT] $($_.Count) failed logons targeting account: $($_.Name)" } }

$report | Out-File "$env:TEMP\darkproject_triage_$(Get-Date -Format 'yyyyMMdd_HHmm').txt"
$report | ForEach-Object { Write-Host $_ }

4. Incident Response Priorities — DARK PROJECT Playbook

T-Minus Detection Checklist (Pre-Encryption Window)

Catch the intrusion before detonation by hunting for these indicators in order:

  1. Anomalous VPN/edge authentication — IKEv1 logins from unusual geographies, especially outside business hours (CVE-2026-50751 exploitation aftermath)
  2. New local/domain admin accounts or unexpected group membership changes
  3. RMM tooling appearing outside approved paths — ScreenConnect/AnyDesk in %TEMP%, %APPDATA%, or C:\ProgramData
  4. Discovery commands in burstsnet group "domain admins", nltest /dclist, arp -a, ipconfig /all from a single workstation
  5. Archive staging — large .zip/.7z/.rar files created in user directories or C:\ProgramData
  6. High-volume egress to file-sharing or cloud storage domains (MEGA, file.io, anonfiles mirrors, Rclone endpoints)
  7. Shadow copy deletion or backup catalog wiping — this is your final warning shot; treat any vssadmin deletion as a sev-1

Assets DARK PROJECT Prioritizes for Exfiltration

Based on victim profile and sector selection:

  • Financial records and customer databases (automotive: credit/financing applications with SSNs — high regulatory exposure)
  • Contracts, blueprints, and network diagrams (energy contractors: these create secondary-victim leverage against utility clients)
  • HR records and payroll data (universal extortion leverage)
  • Email archives from executive mailboxes (often pulled via Exchange exploitation — note CVE-2023-21529 correlation)

Containment Actions — Ordered by Urgency

  1. Isolate suspected hosts at the network layer (EDR network containment or switch-port shutdown) — do NOT power off; preserve volatile memory
  2. Disable compromised accounts and force enterprise-wide credential reset, prioritizing domain admins, service accounts, and VPN-authenticated users
  3. Block C2 and exfil egress at the perimeter: sinkhole observed RMM domains, restrict outbound to approved destinations only
  4. Audit and freeze scheduled tasks / GPO changes — ransomware deployment often rides Group Policy or PSExec pushes
  5. Verify backup integrity and offline isolation before any recovery activity; confirm shadow copies exist on file servers
  6. Engage IR retainer and legal counsel early — automotive and energy victims carry state breach-notification and potentially federal (TSA/CISA) reporting obligations

5. Hardening Recommendations

Immediate (24 Hours)

  • Patch or mitigate CVE-2026-50751 (Check Point IKEv1) — apply vendor hotfix; if patching is not possible, disable IKEv1 aggressive mode and restrict gateway management interfaces to allowlisted IPs
  • Patch CVE-2024-1708 (ConnectWise ScreenConnect) and audit for unauthorized ScreenConnect instances; inventory all RMM tools and block any not on the approved list via application control
  • Enforce phishing-resistant MFA on all remote access (VPN, RDP gateways, M365) — legacy MFA on IKEv1 VPN portals is a known bypass path
  • Block outbound Rclone/MEGA/anonymous file-share traffic at the proxy and enable TLS inspection alerting on bulk transfers
  • Deploy the Sigma rules above to your SIEM and validate the Sentinel KQL hunt returns clean results

Short-Term (2 Weeks)

  • Segment OT-adjacent and contractor-facing networks — energy sector victims demonstrate that service-provider compromise is a stepping stone; enforce jump-host-only access into operational environments
  • Deploy application allowlisting (WDAC or AppLocker) on servers and high-value workstations to blunt unauthorized RMM and staging tools
  • Implement tiered administration with dedicated PAWs; eliminate domain admin logons on member servers and workstations
  • Immutable, offline backups with tested restore runbooks — target <24h RTO for Tier-1 systems
  • Patch cadence for KEV-listed edge infrastructure (Check Point, Cisco FMC, Exchange) on a 72-hour SLA — every CVE in this briefing sat in the KEV for months before this campaign's postings
  • Deception layer: deploy canary files and honey credentials on file shares to provide high-fidelity pre-encryption tripwires

Analyst Bottom Line

DARK PROJECT's 2026-08-04 posting wave is opportunistic, affiliate-driven, and almost certainly edge-device-facilitated. The correlation between the campaign timeline and the Check Point IKEv1 KEV entry is too tight to ignore. Mid-market energy contractors, logistics operators, and automotive retail groups are squarely in this operation's sweet spot — organizations that carry high-value exfil data and face intense operational-downtime pressure but often lack 24/7 detection coverage. Patch the perimeter, hunt for RMM abuse and shadow-copy deletion, and treat any batch of these indicators as an active intrusion, not a drill.

Related Resources

Security Arsenal Incident Response Managed SOC & MDR Services AlertMonitor Threat Detection From The Dark Side Intel Hub

Is your security operations ready?

Get a free SOC assessment or see how AlertMonitor cuts through alert noise with automated triage.